Etiquetas

#AgendaDePeriodistas (1) #FreeBritney (1) #MeToo (1) #NoMeDigasGuapa (1) ABC (1) abuso policíaco (1) aclaración (1) acoso (2) acoso sexual (1) Agencia EFE (2) AgenciaEFE (1) AGN (2) ALDF (1) Alejandro Encinas Rodríguez (1) Alexandra Wallace (1) Alfredo Herrera Patiño (2) Alonso Lujambio (1) An Phung (1) Andrés Manuel López Obrador (1) Angélica de la Peña (1) Animal Político (1) animalismo (2) anónimos (1) Argentina (2) Armando Vega Gil (1) Arthur Lee (1) asiáticos (2) Aurora Gómez Galvarriato (1) Babelia (1) Bernardo Bertolucci (1) Blackface (1) Britney Spears (2) Brozo (1) Cabecita negra racista y cobarde (3) Callo de Hacha (1) Canal del Congreso (1) Carlos Loret de Mola (1) Carlos Ruiz Abreu (1) Carmen Aristegui (1) CDHDF (7) censorship (1) censura (4) Chequeado (1) Chile (2) Chloe Melas (2) Christopher Domínguez (1) Christopher Tuckwood (1) Ciberacoso (1) CIDE (1) CIDH (2) CinePremiere (1) Cisen (4) CNDH (2) CNN (5) Comisión Bicamaral Canal del Congreso (1) Conapred (5) conflicto de interés (2) Consuelo Sáizar (1) Conte Biancamano (1) coreanos (2) Corina Courtis (1) corrupción en México (1) Cynthia Hijar (1) Daniel Bisogno (1) Daniel Moreno Chávez (1) Datos Personales (1) David Vigilante (3) David Vigillante (1) Defensor del Lector (1) Defensora del Lector (1) denuncia (1) Derechos Humanos (1) deshonestidad escritural (1) deshonestidad periodística (1) Diario La República (1) Diego Salázar (1) Dietrich Fischer-Dieskau (1) Digna Ochoa (1) Discriminación (1) Eduardo Bohórquez (1) Eduardo Medina Mora (2) EFE (1) Efectos secundarios (1) El huésped (1) El Mundo (1) El Mundo de Alycia (1) EL PAÍS (1) El Sol de Iquique (2) El Último Tango en París (1) El Universal (1) El vano ayer (1) Elena Garro (5) Elena Poniatowska (1) Elisabeth Schwarzkopf (1) Emiliano Zapata (1) Emilio Álvarez Icaza (3) Emily Kuhn (2) Emmanuel Carballo (1) Enrique Peña Nieto (2) Epigmenio Ibarra (1) Es la Hora de Opinar (4) escritoras (1) espía (1) estereotipo racista asiaticos (1) Etcétera (1) Excélsior (3) Fabio Hua Fang (1) Fact Checking (1) Feminasty (1) Feminismo (1) FEMOSPP (3) Fernando del Paso (1) Fernando Iwasaki (4) Final de Partida (programa TV) (1) Fondo de Cultura Económica (2) Forever Changes (1) ForoTV (2) fraude periodístico (3) Fundación Gabo (4) Gabriel Zaid (2) Gonzalo Celorio (1) Google México (1) Guadalupe Nettel (1) Guillermo Valdés Castellanos (1) Héctor de Mauleón (1) Helena Paz Garro (1) Hilda Téllez Lino (4) hipocresía (1) Humberto Musacchio (1) IFAI (4) IFCN (1) Ingmar Bergman (1) intelectuales (2) intelectuales mexicanos (1) Isaac Echinedu (1) Isaac Rosa (2) Jacqueline Peschard Mariscal (2) Jaime Abello Banfi (2) James Cavallaro (1) Jan Martínez Ahrens (1) Javier Esteinou Madrid (1) Javier García-Galiano (1) Javier Tello (2) Jesús Rodríguez Zepeda (1) Joaquín Díez Canedo (1) John Lennon (1) José Antonio Aguilar Rivera (1) José Carreño Carlón (2) José Luis Luege Tamargo (2) José Luis Martínez S. (4) Jota (José) Linderos (1) Jota Linderos (1) Juan Soto Ivars (1) Julio Cortázar (1) Julio Patán (1) La Razón (1) Laberinto (5) Laura H S (1) Leo Zuckermann (3) Leticia Dolera (1) Letras Libres (1) Ley3de3 (1) leyenda urbana (1) lied (1) Lola Galán (1) Los Angeles Times (1) Love (1) Lucía Melgar (1) Lucy in the Sky with Diamonds (1) Lucy Vodden (1) Luis Buñuel (1) Luis de la Barreda Solórzano (7) Luis de Llano Macedo (3) Luis Echeverría Álvarez (1) Luis González Placencia (1) Maldita.es (1) Marcelo Ebrard (1) Marco Levario Turcott (1) María Marván Laborde (1) Maria Ressa (1) Maria Schneider (1) Mariana Pinango (1) Mariana Piñango (1) Marlon Brando (1) Martha Lucía Micher Camarena (1) Martin Luther King (1) media manipulation (1) Metro DF (1) Michelangelo Antonioni (1) Milenio Diario (5) Morgan Freeman (6) movimiento estudiantil 1968 (1) Nashieli Ramírez Hernández (1) Nexos (3) Nicolás Alvarado (2) nigeriano (1) Óscar Espinosa Villareal (1) Pascal Beltrán del Río (2) Paulo Vannuchi (1) Paulo Vanucchi (1) Pedro Salazar Ugarte (1) Periodismo (1) periodismo declarativo (1) perro Clinton (2) perros primero (1) Pilar Noriega García (1) plaqueta (1) Priscilla Pizarro (1) racismo (8) racismo en México (8) racista (1) Rafael Cabrera (1) Rafael Pérez Gay (1) Rafael Tovar y de Teresa (1) Raúl Trejo Delarbre (2) Recurso de Impugnación (1) Reforma (1) reseña (1) Ricardo Bucio (2) Ricardo Bucio Mújica (2) Ricardo Monreal Ávila (2) Rita Macedo (1) Roberto Escudero (1) Rodrigo Gutiérrez Rivas (1) Rosa Beltrán (10) Santiago Creel Miranda (2) Senado (1) simulación en México (1) suicidio (1) Tamara de Anda (3) Televisa (1) Thomas Quasthoff (1) Tomoo Terada (2) Toronto Star (1) Tracy Wilkinson (1) Transparencia Mexicana (1) Twitter (2) UCLA (1) UNAM (3) USA Today (1) Virgilio Caballero (1) viveza criolla (1) Yahoo México (1) Yolanda Ramírez Hernández (1) Zoé Robledo (1)
Mostrando entradas con la etiqueta David Vigilante. Mostrar todas las entradas
Mostrando entradas con la etiqueta David Vigilante. Mostrar todas las entradas

jueves, 3 de diciembre de 2020

CNN ANONYMOUSLY ATTACKED THE ONE WHO REPORTED THEIR FRAUD. NOW THE ATTACK IS ERASED.




Censorship, journalistic corruption

CNN ANONYMOUSLY ATTACKED THE ONE WHO REPORTED THEIR FRAUD. NOW THE ATTACK IS ERASED.

 

UPDATE: EMAIL SENT TO DAVID VIGILANTE




David Vigilante

Executive Vice President and General Counsel for CNN and Turner Sports


As I told Mariana Pinango, the fact that the Peruvian newspaper La República republishes the note that it kept erased for more than a year, in which she attacked me, hidden behind anonymity, changes nothing.

It is evident that you were betting that feigning false ignorance, pretending that I was never on your radar, this would fade away.

So, after writing to Ted Boutros, Alan Duke, people related to CNN, and many more, in English and Spanish.

After the short and misleading line on English Wikipedia, but that nevertheless notes that the fraud by CNN against Morgan Freeman has been publicly pointed out. And that if it changes, it is deleted, it will be evident that you are behind.





And after recently I wrote to a La República journalist in front of the thousands that took courses online at the Knight Center website.

After all that you decide to repost your anonymous attack against me.

Well, Vigilante guy, then stop hiding behind your desk, move your ass and sue me, because I will not shut up pointing out on your corruption. There are offices of CNN in Mexico (I even called them, and they preferred to kept silent).

As John Malone, of Warner Discovery said “I would like to see CNN evolve back to the kind of journalism that it started with, and actually have journalists, which would be unique and refreshing”. 

Fabricating news and manipulate information according vested interests it's not journalism.


UPDATE: After the reposting, now new erasing:



http://web.archive.org/web/20220903012329/https://larepublica.pe/espectaculos/1370847-morgan-freeman-inocente-periodista-cnn-fabrico-pruebas-denuncia-acoso-sexual-actor-hollywood-harvey-weinstein-me-too-mexico-usa/







 




• Two years ago the CNN spokeswoman for LatAm attacked the author of the investigation published in Spanish, widespread in Ibero-American countries, that proved the then recent  report of sexual harassment about the actor Morgan Freeman it was just a fraud. She requested to not be identified, so the attack published by a newspaper to be anonymous, and she and CNN avoid being accountable if stated an official statement instead. After she was outed, the note has been deleted.

 

• The Peruvian newspaper La República has just deleted the note in which Mariana Pinango asked not to be identified to attack Tomoo Terada without consequences. The action it was part of the conspiracy by CNN to sabotage the spreading of the investigation and retribute Terada for dare to call out CNN. Another newspaper, Spain’s El Mundo, was pressed by CNN’s Emily Kuhn to erase a viral tweet announcing Terada’s investigation.

 

• Tomoo Terada, author of the investigation proving the fraud, had written in Spanish to Pinango and in English to David Vigilante, CNN's lawyer, stating that he knew who was responsible for the attack. Soon after the attack it was erased. So, in more than two years, CNN never denied the accusation of the Morgan Freeman report to be a fabricated journalistic fraud. Conversely, CNN backed out even of the anonymous attack against Terada that they had promoted.

 

• It took Terada more than a year to find out that Pinango was the one hiding behind the “from CNN” unnamed source attribution, and to obtain a copy of the email she sent to La República

 

 

 

Mexico City, November 30, 2020.

The Peruvian newspaper La República (https://larepublica.pe/) (@larepublica_pe) has just deleted (https://larepublica.pe/espectaculos/1370847-morgan-freeman-inocente-periodista-cnn-fabrico-pruebas-denuncia-sexual-harassment-actor-hollywood-harvey-weinstein-me-too-mexico-usa /) without any explanation the note "Morgan Freeman: Someone is questioning the complaint against the actor" (https://web.archive.org/web/20181218034855if_/http://larepublica.pe/espectaculos/1370847-morgan-freeman-inocente-periodista-cnn-fabrico-pruebas-denuncia-acoso-sexual-actor-hollywood-harvey-weinstein-me-too-mexico-usa).


After the original publication of that note by La República two years ago, covering the investigation, very widely spread between Spanish spoken audience, by writer Tomoo Terada proving that the then recent CNN report pointing out to the actor Morgan Freeman as a sexual harasser it was a fraud, Mariana Piñango (@MarianaCNNPR) (Mariana.Pinango@ turner.com) CNN spokeswoman emailed the newspaper calling “the claims of columnist Tomoo Terada” as false, but requesting not to be identified.


The email addressed a copy to Emily Kuhn, a spokeswoman for CNN Digital Worldwide and the Reliable Sources program, hosted by Brian Stelter, who pressed Spain’s newspaper El Mundo to erase a viral tweet announcing the investigation by Terada.


More than a year later, Terada learned that the person hiding behind the “from CNN” unnamed source attribution it was Pinango and got a copy of the email she had sent to the newspaper. For him, it's crystal clear CNN did that way to later claim, if asked, that Terada’s investigation it was not on their radar, or if so, it was not taken seriously to deserving an official rebuttal by them. So, they decided it was better to promote an anonymous attack disguised as an informal rebuttal done by an unnamed member instead. But after being discovered that behind it was the CNN spokeswoman, it would be impossible for CNN to claim that they never knew of Terada’s investigation exposing them as fraudsters making up Freeman's report, or did not care. 


He wrote to her before the pandemic, refuting her claims point by point, such as the actor's apology “it is ridiculous that you want to present the apology that Freeman gave as a proof of discharge of the fraud that you committed, he was the first one fooled by you." Pinango has not responded to Terada.


Recently Terada wrote to Pinango in Spanish and in English to David Vigilante (David.Vigilante@turner.com), CNN's legal vice president, with a copy to Jaime Abello Banfi, director of what is now called the Fundación Gabo (https://fundaciongabo.org /), which originally published Terada's research, in order to prove his identity. He informed Vigilante that he knew the attack published by La República had been by Pinango. And he commented to Vigilante that CNN had looked evil bad by anonymously attacking him instead of answering him with a “direct, public and firm” denial.



It is shortly after Terada wrote to Pinango, Vigilante and the web editor of La República, Rider Bendezú, that the note used by the CNN spokeswoman anonymously attacking Terada it was deleted. 


He thinks CNN recognized more than implicitly the fraud committed if during more than two years  has avoided issuing an official denial, and promoted in just one outlet an anonymous attack instead, and later even backed out of the attack done erasing it without any explanations, after being discovered spokeswoman authorship. 


UPDATE January 18, 2021.

Published on December 8, 2020, by Los Angeles´ La Opinión, the "most-read print newspaper in Spanish in the United States" after the news on CNN fraud circulating for more than two years through Ibero-American media, without a denial.

https://laopinion.com/2020/12/08/morgan-freeman-y-las-acusaciones-de-acoso-que-enfrento/




"The accusations against Freeman disappear

Months later, everything was diluted and the accusations led to nothing. The law did not intervene and there was even talk of journalistic fraud by the media (CNN) that had spoken with the alleged victims, according to an article published by El MundoIt was even said that everything had been devised by a ´racist reporter´."

 

El Mundo is Spain’s second national newspaper. Some kind of Spain’s Washington Post.  CNN pressed the newspaper to erase a viral tweet announcing coverage of Terada’s investigation. And to alter the note that were dealing with it. But CNN never asked for a retraction, never attempt to debunk it, never publicly denied it. 

Will attempt CNN to press an American newspaper like La Opinión, as they did with Ibero-American newspapers El Mundo (Spain) and La República (Peru) to erase and alter the information on their Morgan Freeman fraud?


For more information:

tomoo.terada@gmail.com, tomoo.terada@protonmail.com, teradatomoo.blogspot.com, https://www.facebook.com/tomoo.terada.33/, @NazarioB1 (has been censored too)

The account @Tomoo_Terada is locked due to Twitter censorship, but it can receive DMs.

@TeradaTomoo is available.

Correction: The original link to the material erased by La República it worked at first, but later ended as a broken link. Terada corrected it and wrote Vigilante if he and CNN are playing dirty tricks corrupting and pressing people of Google and Internet Archive.

The original Spanish press release has a lot of links to the media in Spanish that did coverage of the original 2018 story. It's because of being so widely spread that it is so “strange” CNN chose to anonymously attack Terada in one outlet, and press to erase and alter information in the other one, instead of issue an official statement.

domingo, 12 de julio de 2020

A dos años de exponer el fraude de CNN (Morgan Freeman).


ANTES PRESIÓN CNN DESPUÉS PRESIÓN CNN




                                                                                                                                                                      

Hoy hace dos años se publicó Dando a luz un fraude periodístico:Morgan Freeman y CNN, mi investigación del fraude contra Morgan Freeman y el público hispanohablante y mundial, cometido por la reportera de CNN Chloe Melas, al lanzar su reportaje manipulado para acusar a Freeman de acoso sexual a varias mujeres, con la complicidad de otros en CNN y otros medios. 

Dos años en que CNN ha maniobrado en mi contra pero nunca me ha desmentido de forma contundente y pública, siendo una empresa millonaria que en dos horas podría haber elaborado una firme respuesta. No, en lugar de eso escogieron presionar y desinformar, sin dar la cara. Y cuando se dieron cuenta que se había hecho muy grande escogieron quedarse callados, por lo menos públicamente, y mejor presionar y amenazar a otros, para que yo nunca vuelva a publicar algo.



Es una conmemoración agridulce pues por una parte sigo estando muy orgulloso de haber publicado una investigación que, inspirada por el personaje de Mycroft Holmes, desde Mexico fue reuniendo evidencias a través de Twitter sobre un asunto ocurrido en Estados Unidos. La distancia no fue obstáculo.

También me enorgullece que desde el español como lengua  se haya desenmascarado un fraude periodístico urdido en inglés. Hay en muchos periodistas que escriben en español una actitud acrítica y acomplejada ante quienes escriben en inglés. Mira que, por ejemplo, The New York Times publica algunas piezas extraordinarias, pero otras son basura o simplemente mediocres, como el perfil que un tal Sopan Deb hizo de Chloe Melas presentándola como una heroína del periodismo de investigación. He visto a periodistas mexicanos publicar en español letras mucho mejores

Pero en la parte amarga,desagradable, está la traición que sufri por parte de gente quienes consideraba mis amigos. En el mejor de los casos mostrando su envidia y mezquindad; en el peor mostrando que tienen una correa invisible y en el extremo está CNN, procurando hacerme pagar el atrevimiento de exhibir su fraude.

Empezaron por presionar al diario El Mundo, para que borrara dos tuits, uno de  ellos vuelto viral y que anunciaban la cobertura de mi artículo. Sin explicaciones. Eso obviamente no es un desmentido sino un acto de presión.

Un acto de presión para que el considerado como segundo diario nacional de España después de El País borrara dos tuits de su cuenta oficial @elmundoes, uno  a punto de alcanzar los 15.000 retuits. Y no, el tuit no menía al afirmar que "Una periodista de la CNN fabricó evidencias para acusar a Morgan Freeman de acoso sexual. Ahora se ha sabido que el actor es inocente, sin embargo, su imagen quedará dañada para siempre."



Lo que quedó después de la presión de CNN es un tuit de la cuenta de la sección de cultura, que no menciona a CNN.






Que el reportaje fraudulento de Melas fuera alabado acríticamente por dos periodistas con los  que he tenido contacto en redes sociales, y considero bastante listos, pero en cambio se saboteara la difusion de mi investigacion y minimizara su relevancia, fue molesto. A uno,  Diego Salázar, quien se ha dedicado a cazar fake news obvios para su libro No hemos entendido nada se le escapó el fraude a Freeman por cuestiones ideológicas, pues también se perdió detalles importantes del caso de Jian Ghomeshi.

Durísimas las acusaciones contra Morgan Freeman en este reportaje de @CNN, obra de @AnHaiPhung y @Chloe_Melashttps://t.co/ERZhEe25qZ pic.twitter.com/cmS0i9QBY1

— Diego Salazar (@disalch) May 24, 2018






Entrada en proceso de escritura 

 



 

sábado, 7 de septiembre de 2019

Morgan Freeman, Twitter y el final de la placidez

(Esta es una entrada en progreso, e iré completándola poco a poco, lo que incluye correcciones y ampliaciones)






El año pasado publiqué en el portal Red Ética, que forma parte de la entonces Fundación Gabriel García Márquez para el Nuevo Periodismo Iberoamericano (FNPI) ahora Fundación Gabo -creo que el cambio de nombre es un error, más cuando el nombre anterior fue el que tuvo la bendición del propio García Márquez en vida de él-  un análisis del entonces recientísimo escándalo de presunto acoso sexual del actor Morgan Freeman a varias mujeres, según una investigación de la cadena CNN.

Desde un principio me percaté que la supuesta "investigación" firmada por An Phung y Chloe Melas era un descarado fraude.